Heidi Roizen

Heidi Roizen: Personal Life and Professional Career

Heidi Roizen is a full-fletched venture capitalist who is currently employed by Apple. In the beginning, she was an operator in Silicon Valley and used her connections to become a successful venture capitalist. The traits that set her to success are related to networking and communication. Particularly, the capacity to blend social connections and professional communication along with the concept of reciprocity is very appreciated by Roizen. According to her, she spent a long time trying to build her network on a range of communication styles, starting with short conversations, and culminating in meetings (Mooney). Whatever the length of the communication the lasting impression is the result, thereby affecting the relationships between those on the other side. For Roizen, this strategy was productive and successful in her personal life as well as professional endeavors.

According to the principle of reciprocity, Roizen believes it is vital to know the requirements of the person you are competing with (McGinn as well as Tempest 8.). Sometimes, one has to engage in lengthy negotiations to understand what people they are working with need. When both sides are able to communicate and the process accelerates, it is built on long-lasting and solid relationships. The case study indicates that Roizen utilized her network to make contact with people who were in close proximity to one another only in the event that she was certain of the positive results from these strategies. In order to keep and increase her network the capitalist constantly sought to reach out to people by engaging them with clever and innovative concepts and solutions, as well as taking their suggestions on an issue or another business problem.

From the case study, it is clear that Roizen recognized the importance of networking right from the start of her professional career. As a graduate in creative writing as well as a love of writing, she was able to join the tech industry which was not easy to achieve, particularly when you consider how women weren’t typically represented in this field (Ruch as well as Nazemetz 165, 165). The particular action that assisted her to build a successful social network in the way it is today could be described as the maximization of social interactions. That is the try to connect in the most effective way possible to attain the essential quality of a successful individual the so-called social capital – the accessibility of business contacts and the capacity to create an effective network of relationships.

Making the right connections, Roizen considers the process of networking as the searching and growth of relationships that is, where the reciprocal exchange of knowledge and knowledge contributes to the successful outcomes for both sides who communicate (Mooney). It was based on the active interaction with a variety of people which produced the following results expanding contacts that aid in the development of business and resolve various issues and challenges, the development of her personal communication abilities, and enjoyment of interacting with intelligent and interesting people.

Heidi RoizenThe idea of networking evolved during the course of Roizen’s career. If she was determined to connect with new people and to communicate with them to reach her goals while at her first job, she realized that positive aspects of networking are based upon a sense of what she can do to be of value to someone else and the genuine determination to help others. This like a boomerang returns to their cheerful disposition, and some intriguing opportunities (Gulati and others. 516). In her employment in T/Maker and Apple as a venture capitalist, she adheres to the rules of networking, which dictate the dissemination and use of exclusively positive data, as well as an ethical restriction of information that isn’t appropriate to be used in business. Therefore, the positive feelings that are a part of any communication and a well-crafted dialogue could transform a situation of conflict into a winning opportunity and a crisis into a possibility to be an enormous success in the field of career or in business.

The focus of the moment is directed toward maintaining the current network, which has been enlarged and now includes the most prominent CEOs, funders, etc. Roizen thinks that the importance of networking does not mean being just to the appropriate people but also the morality of the relationships in which everyone is winning (McGinn as well as Tempest 7.). This is how we live our life where communication serves as a point of entry as a means of self-education and self-development. It is imperative to emphasize that Roizen says that the idea of networking goes beyond only business relationships. As a way to live it is accepted by people from various social groups and estates. This is the art of having friends with a lot of people. It is fascinating and requires continuous attention and personal growth.

For suggestions for Roizen to expand her network, it’s possible to observe that she reviews a variety of business plans every day and is required to analyze the plans, which takes a significant amount of time. In reality, Roizen experiences a lack of time dedicated to maintaining her network. In this respect, it is advised to concentrate your efforts to keep relationships in order to keep your network competitive and efficient.

Human Resource Manager’s Career Opportunities

Teacher

Decision-Making in an English Teacher ‘s Career

Introduction –This paper aims to analyze the decision-making process of Mr. Higashi according to the case study that is provided. In this instance, the subject is Mr. Higashi has a job as a teacher forty-four, and has 20 years of experience teaching high school English in the vicinity of Soto the city of Soto in Japan.

Perspectives and Theories

If you want to understand the decisions taken by Higashi in this article, we will employ two decision-making theories, which include the MBIT preference as well as the Big Five model. These theories aim to identify the qualities that decision-makers portray during their time of service. The theory is used to study certain decisions taken by Higashi in his duties as the supervisor for the JET program as well as the adviser to teachers.

Decisions by Higashi

  1. He decided to assume the position of teacher’s advisor and was given the responsibility to oversee the JET students automatically.
  2. He continuously advised Kelly to adhere to the Japanese custom of acting in a way that fits to the traditional female domains.
  3. He frequently disenfranchised JET participants as well as other office workers in the process of setting their schedules and became a strict implementer.
  4. When Kelly complained of irritation in her throat, she asked her to carry the doctor’s note before returning to work.
  5. He compelled Kelly and the two other JET members to complete documents to take a paid leave to make up for the sick time and make sure they had a consistent relationship in conjunction with Japanese employees.

Analysis

Selection of Character

In the introduction, Mr. Higashi was a well-known teacher at the high school in Soto for a period of 20 years. Being a highly competent educator and scholar He was given the opportunity to be promoted to a chief advisor for the teachers who were part of the Soto Board of Education (SBE). The promotion required him to be an overseer of all scholars that participated in this program. Japan Exchange Teaching. The purpose of this program was to enable teachers from other regions of the globe to have the chance to instruct in Japan. This implies that his role as a direct supervisor in charge of supervising their performance throughout an exchange.

In fact, the majority of JET participants had a meeting with Mr. Higashi because they were in his classes while they were high school students. In this way the supervisory and teaching job allows him to make important choices in the face of conflict as well as performance-related issues. This means that he has more focused on decisions as compared to Kelly who is an elementary teacher.

Perspectives and Theories to Approach Higashi’s Decisions

One of the theories whose facets are apparent in the decision taken by Higashi is the MBIT preference theory. MBIT preferences are defined by four different dichotomies that seek to answer a variety of questions.

According to this theory, Mr. Higashi is portrayed as an introvert who takes the choice on his own and informs everyone else about what to do, without engaging them in any way. This is evident when Mr. Higashi chose to take an individual of JET students to a high school gathering without informing her prior to the meeting. The participant protested against the decision, and Mr. Higashi was extremely irritated by her decision.

In the second dimension, Mr. Higashi is more focused on sensing than intuition. He prefers things that are easily seen instead of relying on explanations and words offered by JET participants.

In one instance, the judge requested the doctor’s permission from Kelly even though he received phone contact from her about the condition that struck her. Additionally, it is evident that Mr. Higashi is a person who makes decisions through thinking. Based on his choices it is clear that he takes into account factual information prior to making a decision. This was evident in the case of requesting an official doctor’s note in order to establish proof that Kelly was in fact sick. In addition, he takes decisions based on being able to judge instead of being aware. This is due to his belief that he attempts to regulate every subject within the JET program, rather than adjusting to changes in the environment.

On the contrary, it is believed that it is also the case that the Big Five theory seeks to examine the personality of decision-makers according to their openness, conscientiousness extraversion, agreeableness, as well as neuroticism (Ashton Lee and Ashton 2009; Patten, 2011). In accordance with these five dimensions of this model, Mr. Higashi can be described as intellectual, achievement-oriented, sociable, intolerant, and irritable. The intellectual aspect is demonstrated by his professional approach to dealing with the subject.

Explanation of Higashi’s Decisions

Remembering that Mr. Higashi declared that the Japanese take their time off to work for their company and to compensate for sick days, it shows how he wished to impart the values of Japanese culture in the minds of Kelly. The goal was to boost dedication to the business in order to achieve the best results. Furthermore, the stifling acceptance of the paid-leave forms was intended in order to make sure that the organization is not able to lose funds due to employees’ inattention.

Critical Discussions

Advantages of Higashi’s Decisions

Based on the decisions taken by Mr. Higashi It is clear that there was a low chance of recklessness from the perspective of employees. His disciplined and professional method ensured that employees’ claims were scrutinized thoroughly and rigorously in order to prevent any unnecessary loss on the organization’s side. In addition, Mr. Higashi took the right decision to become an advisor due to his vast experience with his profession of teaching.

This means that the anticipated results were found to be improved under his direction and guidance. It is understandable that more appreciation should be awarded to him considering that he accepted the position despite the fact that he was in charge of JET participants who did not understand Japanese. Japanese Language. In this situation, there was an obligation to continue the translation of Japanese into English to ensure that coordination was maintained in the office.

Disadvantages of Higashi’s Decisions

Although he had a goal to improve the performance of the organization it was apparent that he was not thinking about the coexistence between people within the organization. Despite the necessity of implementing strict measures, he stepped into the private lives of employees and consequently made them feel oppressed. In particular, it was insensitive to insist that Kelly should be a part of the Japanese tradition. In this instance, it should be an individual choice for Kelly to decide whether she wants to adopt the Japanese culture or not. Furthermore, the evidence clearly showed that Mr. Higashi took decisions without the involvement of his subordinates.

As an example, he planned for Suzanne to go to the high school’s annual event without notifying her beforehand. This is an oppressive method that increases the resistance of JET participants. JET participants and ruins the relationship between the JET participants.

Recommendations

In the end, Mr. Higashi must be more thoughtful and thoughtful when making critical decisions regarding the group. The first is that he shouldn’t solely focus on results in the financial aspect as well as the welfare of staff (Horton and Leahy, 2009 Leahy 2002). If an employee is able to provide the required documentation to support his or her case, it’s not appropriate to take additional punishment (Johnson and Ostendorf, 2010).

Additionally, Mr. Higashi must be inclusive in making decisions that impact employees. For example, he must be aware of them prior to an event that is attended by employees. This can reduce conflicts between him and JET participants (McAuliffe and Chenoweth 2009). Additionally, she needs to find a new strategy to help instill values that are rooted in the Japanese tradition.

For instance, Mr. Higashi could organize an event that showcases the positive side that is a part of Japanese culture. This is a key role in influencing employees to embrace the values of different cultures (Johnson Rustichini, Johnson, and Macdonald 2010). In other words, imposing these values can increase resistance to change and encroach into the private space. In fact, the manager must be mindful and focus on making sure that the company is financially and socially satisfied (Wischniewski and Brune, 2011,).